The Great Debate: Tommy Freeman vs. Henry Slade - Who Should Start for England? (2026)

Get ready for a thrilling debate! The rugby world is buzzing with the question: who should be England's starting centre for the Six Nations? But here's where it gets controversial... it's not just about talent, it's about strategy and fitting into a unique style of play.

Let's dive into the heart of the matter. While Tommy Freeman's recent form has sparked calls for his inclusion at outside centre, Stuart Barnes argues that Freeman might not be the perfect fit for England's heavy-duty territorial approach. Freeman, a versatile player who can also play full-back or wing, has been on fire, scoring four tries in Northampton Saints' last two matches. But is he the right piece for England's puzzle?

The debate has primarily focused on Freeman and Ollie Lawrence, who played at outside centre during England's victory over the All Blacks in November. However, Barnes believes we're overlooking a key player: Henry Slade. Slade, who filled in for the injured Lawrence and scored a try against Argentina, is a talented fly-half with a unique skill set that could be a game-changer for England.

England's Boks-like Strategy

England's strategy, according to Barnes, is reminiscent of the Springboks: a quest for territory, power, and pace. While Northampton Saints prioritize exploiting space, England craves territory. Barnes writes, "There is no simpler way to gain giant chunks of territory than by playing with an intensity that forces errors and, most importantly, penalties."

The Case for Henry Slade

Freeman's magic moments are undeniable, but Barnes argues that Slade should not be forgotten. At 32, Slade played a pivotal role in Exeter Chiefs' comeback against Bath, helping them level the match from a 26-0 deficit. His left foot, with its scalpel-like precision, magnifies errors, and in the Test arena, a few well-placed kicks could earn England valuable points.

Slade's skill set extends beyond kicking. Barnes highlights his "gorgeous late pass" and soft hands, which create opportunities for his teammates. While Freeman is a wonderful player, Slade's consistent performance and unique abilities make him a strong contender for the outside centre position.

The Jigsaw Puzzle

If Slade starts at 13, Lawrence could shift to 12, but there's a possibility that both Freeman and Lawrence might miss out on a midfield spot. Barnes suggests that Freeman, who would likely move to the wing if not playing at outside centre, and Slade bring different exceptional qualities to the team. Freeman offers excitement, while Slade fits into the Borthwick template.

"Picking a team isn't about selecting the best players but finding the ones that fit the jigsaw," Barnes writes. "What works for Northampton may not work as well for Borthwick and Blackett's England."

So, who do you think should start at outside centre for England? Is it Freeman's magic or Slade's precision that will guide England to victory? Let's spark a friendly debate in the comments and see if we can find a consensus!

The Great Debate: Tommy Freeman vs. Henry Slade - Who Should Start for England? (2026)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Horacio Brakus JD

Last Updated:

Views: 6275

Rating: 4 / 5 (51 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Horacio Brakus JD

Birthday: 1999-08-21

Address: Apt. 524 43384 Minnie Prairie, South Edda, MA 62804

Phone: +5931039998219

Job: Sales Strategist

Hobby: Sculling, Kitesurfing, Orienteering, Painting, Computer programming, Creative writing, Scuba diving

Introduction: My name is Horacio Brakus JD, I am a lively, splendid, jolly, vivacious, vast, cheerful, agreeable person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.