In a jaw-dropping moment that has TV fans buzzing, the legendary original narrator of Big Brother has unleashed a fierce critique on a competing network for cowardly abandoning the revival of what he calls 'the greatest TV show known to man.' But here's where it gets controversial: is this just playful rivalry, or a deeper indictment of how networks choose their programming? Stick around to dive into the drama and see what most people miss about these high-stakes decisions in entertainment.
'Didn't have the balls': TV network slammed for skipping Big Brother comeback
'Didn't have the balls': TV network slammed for skipping Big Brother comeback
Mike Goldman, the unforgettable voice who narrated the original Big Brother series, has given a hearty thumbs-up to Channel 10 for resurrecting this groundbreaking reality TV phenomenon. In the process, he couldn't resist throwing shade at another network, accusing them of lacking the courage to jump on board.
For those new to the scene, Big Brother isn't just a show—it's a cultural phenomenon that thrust ordinary people into a house filled with cameras, challenges, and cutthroat alliances, all in the name of winning a big prize. Imagine it as a real-life social experiment where strategy, betrayal, and human nature collide, keeping viewers glued to their screens night after night. Goldman, who brought that iconic flair to the narration, is thrilled Channel 10 had the guts to breathe new life into it, but he's not afraid to call out the competition for their apparent timidity.
All your news for a great price
Unlock this story and more with your subscription
- Endless access to articles on our app and website
- Exclusive newsletters tailored just for subscribers
- A digital replica of Today's newspaper for easy reading anytime
- Dive into fun games and puzzles to unwind
- SuperCoach Plus insights and stats to enhance your fantasy sports experience
No lock-in contract
$4
for 4 weeks
Then $32 charged every 4 weeks.*
*Read the fine print
Lock in & save
$5
a week for 12 months
($260 min. cost) charged as $20 every 4 weeks. Then $20 charged every 4 weeks.*
*Read the fine print
Full app & web access 24/7
Read the paper online exactly as it was printed
Subscriber exclusive news emails straight to your inbox
Enjoy access to 11 of our news sites (exc. The Australian)
Full app & web access 24/7
Read the paper online exactly as it was printed
Subscriber exclusive news emails straight to your inbox
Enjoy access to 11 of our news sites (exc. The Australian)
Pay As You Go
$4 for 4 weeks
Then $32 charged every 4 weeks.*
Other subscription options
Your Selection: $0
Your Selection
Sorry, we are unable to process your request at this time. Please try again later.
And this is the part most people miss: in the cutthroat world of television, decisions like reviving a hit show can spark heated debates. Is Goldman's swipe fair, or does it reveal a bias toward Channel 10? Some might argue that networks have valid reasons for passing on revivals, like budget constraints or audience shifts toward streaming platforms. Others could see it as a missed opportunity to tap into nostalgia. What do you think—should rival networks prioritize fan favorites over new concepts, or is innovation key to staying relevant? Sound off in the comments below; I'd love to hear your take on this TV tussle!
